Skip to content

Into the Wild

Image of landscape with heather and scots pine in the foreground and hills in the background.
Conservation work at NTS Mar Lodge Estate (Photo credit: Shaila Rao)
Group of people with survey equipment on a hillside.
Surveying upland shielings in Glencoe (Photo credit: Kenny Stewart)

Rural and historical significance of landscapes undergoing re-wilding and other nature-based solutions. Re-wilding – especially of our uplands – includes substantive, large-scale, land-use changes, such as species re-introduction, trophic restoration and re-afforestation. These changes are not subject to planning provision, are often unregulated, and undertaken on an ad hoc, landscape scale basis. These practices can cause direct and indirect large- and small-scale damage and destruction of archaeological sites (e.g. prehistoric settlements; boundaries; industrial sites) as well as impacting landscape character through afforestation, new management and landscape shaping, thus adversely impacting historic environments and heritage. Furthermore, the ecological characteristics of these landscapes today are strongly shaped by historical legacies and often integral to the value we assign to these historic environments.

Consequently, there is limited knowledge of how re-wilding may be impacting historic environments; no guidance to re-wilding land managers around maintaining landscape character; how to protect archaeological sites; best practice advice, and limited appreciation of the deep historic significance of our landscapes and their nature conservation significance. We now need new data informed by practices on the ground and the views of land managers and archaeologists. Our network uses a number of approaches to better understand relationships especially to: (i) enhance understandings of re-wilding, including underpinning environmental values; (ii) identify the challenges faced by re-wilded historic environments and by those who manage and regulate them; (iii) promote dialogue between archaeological, re-wilding, and nature conservation communities around good practice; (iv) create guidance papers, with stakeholders,  for the co-design and integration of cultural heritage and archaeological expertise into re-wilding projects.